Legal Opinion

Dye v. Spohn

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 17, 1941No. 3303PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HORNBECK, J.

This-is-an appeal on questions of law from a judgment in favor of the defendant-appellee, Walter H. Spohn. The action was for damages to an automobile, the loss of its use, and for personal injuries resulting from a collision between a Buick sedan driven by plaintiff and a Graham sedan driven by defendant Spohn.

*125On October 31, 1940, at about 8:30 A. M., plaintiff was driving from Urbana to Columbus on U. S. Route 40. Defendant at the same time was driving westwardly on said highway. When the defendant reached a road which intersects Route 40 from the south at a place…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Slocumb v. WurstOhio Court of Appeals · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gratziano v. GradyOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Smith v. DurstMeigs County Court of Common Pleas · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API