Legal Opinion

Johnsen v. Oakland, San Leandro & Haywards Electric Railway

California Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1900No. S.F. No. 1276PublishedCited by 20 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County and from an order denying a new trial. S. P. Hall, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

PlaintifE has recovered damages for personal injuries received while a passenger upon one of defendant’s electric street-cars. The car was going at an unusual and unlawful rate of speed, and while upon a curve, a flange of the car wheel broke, the car left the track, and plaintiff was precipitated to the ground through a window of the car, to his great injury. 'This appeal of defendant has but little merit.

It is first contended that the excessive speed of the car was not the proximate cause of the accident. This claim is based upon the testimony of defendant’s witnesses to the effect that a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Walsh v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. Ward v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Thomas v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Cox v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1897

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. SpriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Haft v. Lone Palm HotelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Schneider v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Perry v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Law v. GallegherSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API