Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Keels

Hamilton Circuit Court

Decided January 15, 1890Published

Error to the Court- of Common Pleas of Hamilton county.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

These are actions brought by Mrs. Phillips to recover her dower in lands owned by the defendants. The facts in the first of the two cases are these:

(1.) Urial Phillips, on the 29th day of January, 1874, was, and had for six years prior to that time, been the owner in fee simple, subject to the lien of the judgment and mortgage hereinafter mentioned, of Lot No. 2, of S. & A. Phillips’ subdivision, in this county. On said 29th day of January, 1874, he was married to Rosalie, the plaintiff in this case.

(2.) On June 15,1869, and while Urial Phillips was the owner thereof, Julina C. Phillips…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Trustees of Poor v. PrattCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1856

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API