Legal Opinion

Estate of Schinestuhl v. Director

New Jersey Tax Court

Decided February 2, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARAYANAN, J.T.C.

This is the court’s opinion in connection with the parties’ respective motions for summary judgment in the above captioned inheritance tax matter. For the reasons set forth below, the court finds the defendant properly determined that the shares of a publicly traded company inherited by the decedent Claire Schines-tuhl from her brother Prescott Schinestuhl must be separately valued as of the date of her death, and not about two years later when the sale proceeds of the shares were distributed by her brother’s estate.

UNDISPUTED FACTS

Background,

Prescott Schinestuhl (hereinafter…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Pugh v. Tribune Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  3. State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  4. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. PriceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  5. In Re the Estate of RomnesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Estate of Mary Van Riper v. Director, Division of Taxation (082000) (Tax Court & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2020
  2. Village Super Market of PA, Inc. v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API