Legal Opinion

Haviland v. Land Conservation & Development Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 14, 1980No. 78-012, CA 13638PublishedCited by 5 opinions

BUTTLER, P. J.

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Petitioners appeal from an order of the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC or Commission) in which that agency concluded that the City of Medford and Jackson County had not violated statewide planning goals in establishing the urban growth boundaries of Medford which excluded petitioners’ property.

In Spring, 1978, the city and county amended their comprehensive plans, which have not yet been acknowledged by LCDC, by passing ordinances each establishing an urban growth boundary around the city of Medford. The boundaries were drawn in order to comply with LCDC Statewide Planning…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McPherson v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Culver v. DaggCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. Home Builders Ass'n of Metropolitan Portland v. Metropolitan Service DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Miller v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Publishers Paper Co. v. Benton CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API