Thorne v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Appellant was convicted of attempting to “deal, play or practice the game called three-card monte” pursuant to D.C.Code 1981, § 22-1506. Appellant now, as at trial, asserts that a necessary element of the offense is a demonstrated intent by a defendant to deceive or trick. The trial court expressly rejected this claim.1 We affirm.
Appellant was arrested while engaging with pedestrians in the game of three-card monte.2 The arresting officer observed two individuals play the game with appellant before the officer himself offered a wager and, after losing, placed appellant under arrest.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Leiss v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Bond v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. TerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- United States v. BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. EdgenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.