Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Luckenbach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 4, 1953PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The facts are fairly stated in the dissenting opinion.

The weight of the evidence establishes that the trust is entitled to a share of the business rather than fractional interests in specific ships. The deceased trustee might have kept trust affairs and accounts in such shape as to justify application of the “ fractional interest ” theory, but the fact is that he did not do so. He kept no trust accounts after the year 1914, and thereafter commingled trust and personal assets without means of separate identification. His acts and statements, together with the testator’s will and the other…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of LuckenbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  2. In re the Accounting of LuckenbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API