Smith v. New England Mutual Life Insurance
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION OF
PADGETT, J.,
WITH WHOM LUM, C.J., JOINS
We respectfully dissent.
The majority today, in a case where cross-motions for summary judgment were filed, and the appellee’s motion granted, orders a remand for entry of judgment in favor of the appellant insurance company.
The majority begins with the flat assertion that the facts in this case are undisputed. That is simply not so, as is demonstrated below in the extended discussion of the facts in the record.
The appellee, in arguing in support of the judgment below, conceded in her brief here that the decedent became a permanent…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Parnar v. Americana Hotels, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
- Abraham v. S. E. Onorato GaragesHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
- Cahill v. Hawaiian Paradise Park CorporationHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
- Lee M. Seiler v. Lucasfilm, Ltd., Industrial Light and Magic, Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation, George Lucas, Jr., and Joseph E. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- First Hawaiian Bank v. WeeksHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.