Legal Opinion

Square D Company v. Bliss Sorenson, Karl A. Dormeyer, and Albert F. Dormeyer, Doing Business as Dormeyer Industries

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 28, 1955No. 11338_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge.

This action was brought to obtain an injunction and damages for an alleged infringement of a trade mark. The district court granted the injunction and ordered the case referred to a master to determine damages and take an accounting. The errors relied on arise in respect to the findings of fact and conclusions of law upon which the court based its decree against the defendant, from which this appeal was taken.

The trade mark sued on by plaintiff is:

The accused mark of defendant follows:

In 1914, plaintiff’s predecessor, Detroit Fuse & Manufacturing Company, obtained…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Champion Spark Plug Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Winsted Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Straus v. Notaseme Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Albert Dickinson Co. v. Mellos Peanut Co. Of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  5. G. H. Mumm Champagne v. Eastern Wine Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Schutt Manufacturing Co. v. Riddell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  2. Spangler Candy Co. v. Crystal Pure Candy Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1964
  3. National Van Lines, Inc. v. Alfred E. Dean and Dean Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
  4. Robert Bruce, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Riverbank Laboratories v. Hardwood Products Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API