Legal Opinion

Peck v. Brush

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 16, 1915PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, brought to and tried by the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County, Scott, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiffs, and appeal by the defendant Brush.

1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.

The only question which the defendant raises on this appeal is whether the plaintiff’s lien properly covers the entire property included in the judgment of foreclosure; and the material facts bearing upon that issue are as follows: The premises described in the complaint consist of a lot of land in the city of Danbury sixty-seven feet in width on Lincoln Avenue and one hundred and twenty-four feet in depth, formerly belonging to the defendant Kolpa, and conveyed to the defendant Brush after the plaintiff’s certificate of lien was filed.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff furnished…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rose v. Persse & Brooks Paper WorksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1860
  2. Wilcox v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
  3. Tramonte v. WilensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. J. C. Penney Properties, Inc. v. Peter M. Santella Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Schultz v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  3. First Constitution Bank v. Harbor Village Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. Peck v. BrushSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  5. Biller v. HarrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API