Le Maistre v. Clark
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.
The single question presented for consideration by this court is the correctness of the judgment of the Court of Appeals in dismissing the plaintiff’s appeal on questions of law and fact and retaining the appeal as one on questions of law alone.
■ The plaintiff relies upon one sentence in Section 6, Article IV of the Constitution of Ohio which.reads in part as follows:
“The courts of appeals shall have * * * appellate jurisdiction in the trial of chancery cases * *' *.”
Restating the question more simply, what is contemplated by the phrase “appellate jurisdiction in the trial of chancery cases”1?
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Forest City Investment Co. v. HaasOhio Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by13 opinions
- Beach v. BeachOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
- In Re Estate of StaffordOhio Supreme Court · 1946
- Selig v. Board of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 1967
- Thompson v. Moore, TrusteeOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
- Overesch v. CampbellOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.