Indian Rocks Property Owners Ass'n v. Glatfelter

I agree with the lead Justices that there is a difference between infrastructure and aesthetics. See Opinion Announcing the Judgment of the Court (“OAJC”), at 568-70, 28 A.3d at 1265-66. I would merely note, however, that some of the concerns raised by Appellant regarding the construction on Appellees’ property were of the former type.1 In any event, here, I believe we are confronted with the different question of what constitutes a “recreational cabin” under the Uniform Construction Code.

In this regard, I support Mr. Justice Baer’s position that the conception is ambiguous and should be…