United States v. Graham
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ORRICK, District Judge.
Defendants, William Graham and Gregory Corley, both pled guilty to Count Three of an indictment charging them with conspiracy to manufacture and distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Sentencing is governed by the substantive offense, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and the United States Sentencing Commission Guidelines (“Guidelines”). On March 29, 1989, in anticipation of the sentencing hearing scheduled for April 12, 1989, a presentence conference was held in this case to discuss the one issue that the government and the defendants cannot agree…
2Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Gregory L. Corley and William E. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Bruce M. CarlisleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Rodney K. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Larry W. McMahonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Marcus Kevin BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.