Legal Opinion
Hume v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided February 27, 1941No. L. A. 17610Published
1Opinion of the Court
17 Cal.2d 506 (1941)
DAVID E. HUME, Petitioner,
v.
SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY et al., Respondents.
L. A. No. 17610.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
February 27, 1941.
David E. Hume, in pro. per., and Wyman G. Reynolds and Bruce W. Teagarden for Petitioner.
Earl Warren, Attorney-General, Herbert E. Weinig, Lewis Drucker, Deputies Attorney-General, J. H. O'Connor, County Counsel and Ned Marr, Deputy County Counsel, for Respondents.
CURTIS, J.
This is a proceeding by certiorari to review an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County convicting the petitioner, David E. Hume, of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bridges v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Blodgett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- California Development Co. v. New Liverpool Salt Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
- Lamberson v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Otis v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1905
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.