Legal Opinion

Gollehon v. Gollehon

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1934No. 24849. Department OnePublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action is based on a promissory note. The defendant denied liability because she had been relieved therefrom by a discharge in the Federal bankruptcy court. The trial resulted in findings of fact, from which the court concluded that no recovery could be had upon the note. From the judgment dismissing the action, the plaintiff appeals.

December 5, 1925, O. B. Gollehon and Olive 0. Gollehon, his wife, the respondent, signed a promissory note in the sum of $1,325, payable to J. H. Gollehon, the appellant. October 19, 1927, the makers of the note filed in the district court of the United…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tacoma Savings & Loan Ass'n v. NadhamWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. George v. JenksWashington Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API