Legal Opinion

State v. Rockette

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 10, 2005No. 2004AP2731-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

¶ 1. The facts here are unique in that, while most Miranda 1 issues involve situations where custodial questioning occurs without an officer reading warnings and without counsel present, this case is about a lawyer who, while present during questioning, instructed the officer not to read the Miranda warnings and told his client that if the warnings were not given, whatever he said could not be used in court. This unusual advice did not relieve the officer from reading the warnings — he should have. His failure to do so left open the probability that Xavier J. Rock-ette, the defendant in this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State Ex Rel. Goodchild v. BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. TurnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State Ex Rel. Warren v. SchwarzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. HaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. LehrkeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018
  2. State v. Nicolas Subdiaz-OsorioWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. Nicolas Subdiaz-OsorioWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API