Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Daifuku North America Holding Co.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 30, 2021No. 2:21-cv-01461Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL SHAW, No. 2:21-cv-01461-DAD-JLT 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND AND GRANTING 14 DAIFUKU NORTH AMERICA PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS’ HOLDING COMPANY, et al., FEES 15 Defendants. (Doc. No. 9) 16 17 18 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion to remand this action to the 19 Sacramento County Superior Court filed on August 31, 2021. (Doc. No. 9.) Pursuant to General 20 Order No. 617 addressing the public health emergency posed by the COVID-19…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. HensonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Hunter v. Philip Morris USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Matheson v. Progressive Specialty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API