Legal Opinion

In re Bartholomew

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Original Proceeding in Habeas Corpus. Petition filed in this court on January 5,1889; the opinion, filed at the session of the court in April, states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hobton, C. J.:

Lucy C. E. Gay brought her action against George W. Bartholomew, to recover upon a promissory note and foreclose a mortgage given to secure the same. The petition set forth that the note had become due and the mortgage subject to foreclosure by reason of the failure of the defendant to pay the semi-annual installment of interest when, by the terms of the note, the same became due. The defendant answered, pleading payment of interest, and therefore that nothing was due; to which answer, plaintiff replied by a general denial. Neither the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wayland v. . TysenNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Barker v. FosterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  3. Schultze v. RodewaldNew York Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Fay v. CobbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. FenimoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API