Beard v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. of Boston
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Barnes,
On January 29, 1919, the defendant issued to Meri ITrvojevic its policy of industrial life insurance in the sum of $296.00. The plaintiff, who was formerly known as Rosie Filipcic, a daughter of the insured, was named as beneficiary in the policy. The policy contained a so-called “facility of payment” clause, which reads in part as follows: “The company may make payment either to the beneficiary above named, if living, or to such other living beneficiary as may be duly and finally designated, and recognized by endorsement hereon, or to the executor or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Thomas v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Williard v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Bradley v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Smith v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Brennan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Volkwein v. Volkwein, Exr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Fulforth v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Milner v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaPennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1961
- Kitt v. Philadelphia-United Life InsurancePennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1947
- Ryan v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936