Goehring v. Dillard
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentHart, J.
I concur in the first paragraph of the syllabus of this case, but must dissent from the second paragraph and from the judgment. In my opinion, the statutory disqualification of an interested witness can be removed only by a waiver on the part of the party protected by the provisions for disqualification. To remove the disqualification of an interested witness through the giving or introduction of testimony by an adversary, concerning’matters as to which the disqualified witness is incompetent, the testimony of the adverse party must have been voluntarily given. Crafton v. Inge, 124 Ky., 89,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Loeb v. SternIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- Corning v. . WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- de Nottbeck v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
- Sorrell v. . McGheeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Patterson v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.