Richardson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
— Conviction is for the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of one year.
The only complaint made is that charging that the court erred in admitting in evidence the written confession of the appellant. The confession, in form, is in full compliance with the statute — Article 810, Code of Criminal Procedure. It was signed by the appellant thus:
His
“Willie X. Richardson.” Mark
The witnesses were C. T. Baker, M. E. Veasey, and H. C. Hudson. The objection urged was that “it did not appear from the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- The People v. FoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Beltran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Nixon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Hulen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Sanders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.