Legal Opinion

City of Florala v. Presley

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 21, 1971No. 4 Div. 27Published

1Opinion

ON REHEARING

Appellant, on rehearing, asserts for the first time that the actual notice had by the City of Florala was of an incident in which appellee appeared to have no injuries, i. e., an incident at 5th Avenue without injuries. Moreover, appellant implies that as a result thereof it was denied an opportunity to investigate the claim and settle it, if possible, to avoid the expense of litigation. Appellant thereafter says, in brief, that “presumably the City could find no evidence of injury of appellee on 5th Avenue, hence no payment.”

We find no merit in appellant’s contentions. Appellant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grigsby v. LilesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  2. Grigsby v. LilesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API