Legal Opinion

Davies v. Cheadle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1903No. 4524PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court*, King County. — Hon. Boyd J. T allman, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered hy

Hadley, J.

— This action was brought by respondents against appellants to quiet title. Respondents are husband and wife. They allege in substance that on the 6th day of October, 1901, one Lamar Cheadle, then a resident of King county, Washington, departed this life; that said Lamar Cheadle was unmarried, and left no wife, children, father, or mother surviving him, his only heirs at law being his brother and sister, the appellants herein, Raphael Cheadle and Marinda Schaffer; that said Raphael Cheadle is the administrator of the estate of said Lamar…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kofka v. RosickyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Svanburg v. FosseenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  3. Brinton ex rel. Pavey v. Van CottUtah Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Bryson v. McShaneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Rohrer v. SnyderWashington Supreme Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hubbell v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Harrison v. HarrisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Cole v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Ryan v. LoftonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. In Re Schnoor's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API