Cook v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
The chancellor ruled that the complaint in this case failed to state a cause of action for an illegal exaction, and, as a result, the chancery court did not have jurisdiction. Appellant appeals and argues that she pleaded facts sufficient to state a cause of action for an illegal exaction. The ruling of the chancellor was correct, and, accordingly, we affirm.
The facts pleaded were that appellant taxpayer purchased, within the State, a new automobile and an extended warranty, and that appellee Revenue Division of the Department of Finance and Administration…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Little Rock v. CashSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Pledger v. Featherlite Precast Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Merwin v. FussellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Ragan v. VenhausSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Waters Peirce Oil Co. v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pockrus v. Bella Vista Village Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994