Legal Opinion

Cook v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 5, 1993No. 92-670PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

The chancellor ruled that the complaint in this case failed to state a cause of action for an illegal exaction, and, as a result, the chancery court did not have jurisdiction. Appellant appeals and argues that she pleaded facts sufficient to state a cause of action for an illegal exaction. The ruling of the chancellor was correct, and, accordingly, we affirm.

The facts pleaded were that appellant taxpayer purchased, within the State, a new automobile and an extended warranty, and that appellee Revenue Division of the Department of Finance and Administration…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Little Rock v. CashSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Pledger v. Featherlite Precast Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Merwin v. FussellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  4. Ragan v. VenhausSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  5. Waters Peirce Oil Co. v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pockrus v. Bella Vista Village Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API