Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 30, 1895No. 638PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Ho statement necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSOH, Judge.

The jury having been impaneled, issues joined, and the State’s evidence adduced, the county attorney discovered a variance between the complaint and the information in regard to the date of the alleged offense. The complaint alleged the date to be April 28, 1894, the information the 30th day of May, 1894. Upon motion of the county attorney, resisted by appellant, the court permitted the information to be so amended as to conform to the time alleged in the complaint, and the trial proceeded to appellant’s conviction. This was directly in violation of article 550 of the Code of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Meyer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Broughton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Hamilton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API