Legal Opinion

Reineke v. Reineke

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 2005No. 20050006PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Frances Michels appealed a second amended judgment that increased her *860spousal-support award. Michels argues the increase is insufficient to fulfill her enhanced burden to satisfy debt discharged in bankruptcy by her ex-husband, Ronald Reineke. We reverse the second amended judgment and remand for further proceedings to reconsider the amount and duration of the spousal-support payments.

[¶ 2] Michels and Reineke were divorced pursuant to a district court judgment that awarded Michels possession of the parties’ marital home and ordered her to satisfy the first…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Van Oosting v. Van OostingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Sommer v. SommerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Kopp v. KoppNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Lill v. LillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Fritz v. Daiker (In Re Daiker)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leverson v. LeversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Smestad v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Reineke v. ReinekeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API