Reineke v. Reineke
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Frances Michels appealed a second amended judgment that increased her *860spousal-support award. Michels argues the increase is insufficient to fulfill her enhanced burden to satisfy debt discharged in bankruptcy by her ex-husband, Ronald Reineke. We reverse the second amended judgment and remand for further proceedings to reconsider the amount and duration of the spousal-support payments.
[¶ 2] Michels and Reineke were divorced pursuant to a district court judgment that awarded Michels possession of the parties’ marital home and ordered her to satisfy the first…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Van Oosting v. Van OostingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Sommer v. SommerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Kopp v. KoppNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Lill v. LillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Fritz v. Daiker (In Re Daiker)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Leverson v. LeversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Smestad v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Reineke v. ReinekeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005