Legal Opinion

Smith v. Inhabitants of Dedham

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 28, 1887PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

At a town meeting of Dedham, held in 1883, the town authorized its selectmen to make a contract with the Dedham Water Company for three years, at the rate of $5000 per year, for the service of one hundred hydrants, the company ■agreeing to give, free of charge, the supply of water to public buildings, water troughs, and cemeteries. The selectmen made the contract. A town meeting was duly called on August 30, 1886, to consider, among other things, an article in the warrant, to see what action the town would take with reference to a supply of water for fire and other service. Under this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grant v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  2. Stetson v. KemptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
  3. Agawam National Bank v. Inhabitants of South HadleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  4. Nutter v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. City Council v. Dawson Waterworks Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. Saleno v. City of NeoshoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  5. Rauch v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1897

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API