State v. Renfro

[¶ 1] Walter H. Renfro appeals from a judgment of conviction entered by the trial court (Kennebec County, Benson, J.) after a jury found him guilty of operating under the influence (Class B), 29-A M.R.S. § 2411(1-A)(D)(2) (2016).1 Renfro argues *776that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding, pursuant to M.R. Evid. 403, the finding of an administrative hearing examiner that Renfro’s Intoxilyzer test results were unreliable due to improper pre-test observation by police.2 We conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion and affirm the judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶ 2] “When the…