Organization for the Advancement of Minorities With Disabilities Suing on Behalf of Its Members v. Brick Oven Restaurant
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
[Doc. No. 5.]
GONZALEZ, Chief Judge.
Presently before the Court is the motion of defendants Barney Scardino and Mary Scardino (collectively “defendants”) to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 1 For the following rea sons, the Court grants in part and denies in part defendants’ motion.
BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background
Plaintiff David Singletary uses a wheelchair for mobility because he is a paraplegic and unable to walk. (David Singletary Declaration ISO Opp. ¶ 3.) Defendants, through the Barney L. &…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Schutza v. CuddebackDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
- Harris v. Stonecrest Care Auto Center, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2007
- Louie v. BFS Retail & Commercial Operations, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Kohler v. REDNAP, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Montano v. Bonnie Brae Convalescent Hospital, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.