Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Piper

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 13, 1990No. C8-82-1658PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This matter comes before the court based on the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations of the referee appointed to take evidence concerning the alleged misconduct of the respondent Paul C. Piper. The referee found that respondent had committed unprofessional conduct warranting public discipline. Respondent joined the Director of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board in recommending to the referee that appropriate discipline pursuant to Rule 15, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, would be an indefinite suspension from the practice of law with no right…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against ShinnickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API