In Re Disciplinary Action Against Piper
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
This matter comes before the court based on the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations of the referee appointed to take evidence concerning the alleged misconduct of the respondent Paul C. Piper. The referee found that respondent had committed unprofessional conduct warranting public discipline. Respondent joined the Director of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board in recommending to the referee that appropriate discipline pursuant to Rule 15, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, would be an indefinite suspension from the practice of law with no right…
2Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against ShinnickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996