In re Manning
District Court, S.D. New York
In Bankruptcy.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The desired writ, which is for the punishment of an officer of the court for contempt in not paying over money as ordered, should not be addressed to any marshal beyond the territorial j urisdiction of the court. A United States court cannot send its process into another district, except where specially authorized so to do by some act of congress. *276Ex parte Graham, 3 Wash. C. C. 456, 462. Subpoenas are thus authorized to the distance of 100 miles. Such contempts as fall within section 725 of the United States Revised Statutes are criminal offenses against the United States, (Fischer v. Hayes,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- New Orleans v. Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Ex parte GrahamU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1818
- In re HenrichU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1867
- Fischer v. HayesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1881
- United States v. CaseU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1871
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.