Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 7, 1995No. 933SC1190PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Defendant brings forward several assignments of error. After careful review of the record and briefs, we find no prejudicial error.

I

Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress the drugs recovered from him. In a related assignment of error, defendant also contends that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress the statements he made to Officer Wayman at the time of his arrest. We disagree and find no error.

Defendant contends that the drugs and his statements should have been suppressed because he was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. State v. BonneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. StaffordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. YanceyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. FaisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  4. State v. LambertCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API