Legal Opinion
Trumpfeller v. Crandall
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided June 15, 1931PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFarrington, J.
On general motion and exceptions. An action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant in the operation of his automobile in which the plaintiff was riding as an invited guest. The jury returned a verdict for ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00).
The plaintiff and the defendant were both in the employ of the American Telephone and Telegraph Company at its radio station at Houlton, Maine. ■
On the evening of June 22, 1929, defendant invited the plaintiff to ride with him in his car. For a time they rode about town and then went to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schwartz v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Cunningham v. City of Thief River FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Landry v. HubertSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- Crescent Motor Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Downs v. PoulinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
- Honeycomb Systems, Inc. v. Admiral InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1983
- W. W. Clyde & Co. v. DyessCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Illingworth v. MaddenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1937
- Morey v. StrattonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.