State v. Keegan
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.
The defendant addresses his arguments to two issues: “(1) whether the State established a Corpus Delicti (2) whether the indictment was proved by the evidence presented.”
The statute here involved, RSA 583:3, reads as follows: “If any person shall, in the nighttime, break or enter . . . any building . . . lying within the body of any county . . . and shall therein commit larceny, he shall be imprisoned not more than five years.”
As to the first issue raised, the defendant argues that neither the cash register, from which a small sum was taken, nor any of the several bottles of liquor, which…
2Cited by7 opinions
- State v. FraserSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- State v. FrenchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- State v. TherrienSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- State v. MorinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
- State v. WestSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.