Tuttle v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Petitioners are the children of Ray W. Tuttle, the deceased employee. Respondents Eugene Keith Trautman and Lorraine O’Neil Trautman are not the children of said deceased but are the children of Rilla May Tuttle. The respondent commission found that all four of said children were wholly dependent upon said deceased and in effect divided the death benefit equally among them under the provisions of section 4703 of the Labor Code. Petitioners seek to annul said award claiming that there was no evidence to support the finding that the Trautman children were wholly dependent upon the deceased.
Said…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Peterson v. Industrial Accident CommisionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by9 opinions
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. FreelandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Larsen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Munoz v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.