Legal Opinion

Garfield v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas A. Aurelio, J.

The motion of the defendant The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States for dismissal of the complaint as to it pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 and pursuant to subdivision 2 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice is granted. The amended complaint was served by direction for the purpose of eliminating all allegations charging illegality (7 Mise 2d 419). There remained, and the amended complaint can charge, only improvidence, lack of due care and prudence with respect to the leases, the expenditures made in connection therewith and the acquisition of the area devoted to…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Garfield v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Garfield v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API