Legal Opinion

Lingle v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1904PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boggs

This is an attempt on the part of Samuel B. Lingle and Joseph Barnett to perfect an appeal from the judgment of the superior court of Cook county fixing the just compensation to be paid to the owners of certain lots and parts of lots to be taken, under the provisions of an ordinance of the city of Chicago, for the purpose of opening Princeton avenue from West Forty-sixth street to West Forty-sixth place, and confirming a special assessment against lots and parts of lots of which the said Lingle, Barnett and others, to the number of forty or more, are the owners, respectively, for the benefits…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tedrick ex rel. Ruffner v. WellsIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Hileman v. BealeIllinois Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Hanberg v. CohenIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. City of Momence v. KirbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Kissack v. BourkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907
  4. Bieber v. ThomaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1914
  5. Hopper v. ConnellyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API