Legal Opinion

In re the Contested Senatorial Election

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Election Contest.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

JUDD, C.J.

Tlie election in question, a special one ordered by tbe Minister •of tbe Interior to fill a vacancy caused by tbe resignation of Charles Notley, Senator of tbe First Senatorial District, was duly beld on tbe 6tb January last. Tbe proper officer made return to tbe Minister of tbe Interior that tbe election resulted in a tie, each of tbe two candidates, H. L. Holstein and Alexander Young, receiving tbe same number of ballots, to wit, 127.

A petition was filed by said H. L. Holstein in tbis court, within tbe statutory time of thirty days after tbe election,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bowers v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  2. Sego v. StoddardIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Phelan v. Walsh &8212 Sanger v. HenrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
  4. Curran v. ClaytonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Liftee v. BoyerHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. THIRTY VOTERS OF CTY. OF KAUAI v. DoiHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Territory v. Ah GoonHawaii Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Jensen v. Sec'y of haw.S.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Blake v. BakerHawaii Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API