Legal Opinion

Schupp v. Yagle

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 4, 1942No. Appeal, 284PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

This action arose from a collision between two automobiles. The verdict of the jury was in favor of plaintiff. The court below entered judgment n,. o.. v. for. defendant on the ground that plaintiff was contribu-torily negligent as a matter of law. This appeal is by plaintiff.

The accident occurred at the corner of Braddock Avenue and Kelly Street in the city of Pittsburgh. Braddock Avenue runs north and south and Kelly Street east and west. The latter is a through highway 40 feet in width between curbs, and Braddock Avenue is 30 feet in width between curbs. About 4 p. m.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. Merchants Baking CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Lehner v. SchellhaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Goddard v. Armour & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Porreca v. North Cleaners & Dyers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maiden v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Furia v. PerriSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Dowbenko v. Philadelphia Transportation Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API