Legal Opinion

Staton v. Holzbach

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided April 20, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00631Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT TERRELL STATON, Plaintiff, No. 3:20-cv-631 (SRU) v. JOHN HOLZBACH, et al., Defendants. ORDER Terrell Staton filed the instant motion to reopen the case. See Doc. No. 48. Because Staton essentially asks that I vacate my judgment dismissing his complaint, I construe his motion as one for reconsideration pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e) and 60(b). The standard for granting a motion for reconsideration is strict, and reconsideration will generally be denied unless the moving party can point to “an intervening change in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barnett v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API