Legal Opinion

Carroll v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 30, 1984No. 84-202PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORFINGER, Judge.

Appellant pleaded guilty to violation of probation, and elected to be sentenced under the new sentencing guidelines. The trial court rejected this request because the crime for which appellant had originally been placed on probation had occurred pri- or to the effective date of the guidelines. We remand for resentencing.

The State’s contention that appellant may not appeal because he pleaded guilty is not well taken. Á defendant may appeal a sentence which he contends is not in conformity with the guidelines, even after the entry of a guilty plea to the substantive charge. Key…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Rules of Criminal ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Duggar v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Key v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Gordon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mischler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Kimble v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API