Legal Opinion · Dissent

Donaldson v. Alcona County Board of County Road Commissioners

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 8, 1996No. Docket No. 182032Published

1DissentGriffin, P.J.

I respectfully dissent. I agree with the majority that plaintiffs possess standing and that the circuit court erred in ruling otherwise. However, I would hold that evidence that defendant road commission continuously plowed and periodically graded the road for approximately forty years presents a genuine issue of material fact whether the road became a public highway under Michigan’s highway by user statute, MCL 221.20; MSA 9.21. I would reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I

The circuit court erred in ruling that plaintiffs lack standing to pursue this matter. I would adopt and follow…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. County of Wayne v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Alton v. MeeuwenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Crosby v. City of GreenvilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Kraus v. MICH. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCEMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Eager v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1965

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API