Legal Opinion
Kearse v. KAPLAN, INC.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 12, 2010No. 09 Civ. 4176(LAK)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff took a Law School Aptitude Test (“LSAT”) preparation course offered by defendant Kaplan, Inc. (“Kaplan”), the well known test preparation company, in August 2003. He brought this action in 2009. He here claims that the price he paid for the LSAT prep course six years before was greater than otherwise would have been the case as a result of an alleged 1996 market allocation agreement between Kaplan and BAR/BRI, in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, pursuant to which BAR/BRI is said to have agreed to withdraw from the LSAT prep…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rodriguez v. West Publishing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Anthony R. Caputo David A. Cook Paul B. Pebbles Duncan B. Robertson v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Four Seasons Solar Products Corp. v. Southwall Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
3Cited by1 opinion
- McKeefry v. Town of BedfordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019