Legal Opinion
Holmes v. Grooms
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided July 1, 2019No. Civil Action No. 3:18-cv-709PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Robert E. Payne, Senior United States District Judge
By ORDER entered on May 17, 2019 (ECF No. 48), the Court directed the parties to provide supplemental briefing on whether the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims asserted in the *539FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ("FAC") (ECF No. 27). Having considered PLAINTIFF OLIVER HOLMES' SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF REGARDING SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION (ECF No. 49), DEFENDANTS' JOINT SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF REGARDING SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION (ECF No. 50), and PLAINTIFF OLIVER HOLMES' SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY BRIEF REGARDING SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION (ECF No.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Gonzalez v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Henderson v. ShinsekiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Alvarez v. Iron Workers Union Local 709District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2023