Legal Opinion

Danzinger v. Seamen's Bank for Savings

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided June 15, 1914Published

Action by plaintiff to establish her right to a certain deposit in the Seamen’s Bank for Savings.

1Opinion of the CourtRansom, J.

The plaintiff sues to establish her right to a certain deposit made by her brother, Max'Dan-zinger, in the Seamen’s Bank for Savings. The account stood in the brother’s name, and he did not comply with the by-laws and rules of the defendant bank prescribing the manner in which a transfer of the *318account might effectively be made inter vivos. The plaintiff therefore relies on the theory that her brother made a gift causa mortis of this deposit to her. The facts of the case do not show the presence of the essential elements of a gift causa mortis, and I direct judgment for the defendant.

In cases…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Devlin v. Greenwich Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. In re Final Account of SwadeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  3. Podmore v. Dime Savings BankNew York Supreme Court · 1899
  4. O'Brien v. Elmira Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API