Hill v. Hill
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
The trial court erred in failing to classify property, in the valuation of property, and in considering a distributional factor that was based on an erroneous finding. Portions of the trial court’s order are vacated, and this matter is remanded to the trial court.
I. Factual and Procedural History
Charles Jeffrey Hill (plaintiff) and Dawn S. Hill (defendant) were married on 3 August 1996. Two children were bom of the marriage. The parties separated on 6 July 2009. On 18 August 2009 plaintiff filed a complaint seeking custody of the children and equitable distribution of marital…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Dogwood Development & Management Co. LLC v. White Oak Transport Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
- North Carolina State Highway Commission v. HeldermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Wiencek-Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Blair v. BlairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- Chafin v. ChafinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Abdeljabar v. KhalilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- Arroyo v. YanezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- Dalton v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.