British Overseas Airways Corp. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
Section 1006(a) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, 49 U.S.C.A. § 1486(a), here relied on, does not authorize review by this court, now or later, of the proposed regulation in suit, since it is “[an] order in respect of * * * foreign air *953carrier[s] subject to the approval of the President” under Section 801 of the Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 1461. See Chicago & Southern Air Lines v. Waterman S. S. Corp., 333 U.S. 103, 68 S.Ct. 431, 92 L. Ed. 668, interpreting the identical provision of the Civil Aeronautics Act, § 1006(a), formerly 49 U.S.C.A. § 646. The prohibition cannot be…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
3Cited by4 opinions
- Laker Airways Ltd. v. Sabena, Belgian World AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- British Overseas Airways Corporation, British West Indian Airways, Limited, and Bahamas Airways, Limited v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Cunard Eagle Airways, Ltd., Intervenors. Scandinavian Airlines System v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Cunard Eagle Airways, Ltd., Intervenors. Societe Anonyme Belge D'Exploitation De La Navigation Aerienne (Sabena) v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Cunard Eagle Airways, Ltd., Intervenors. Klm Royal Dutch Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Cunard Eagle Airways, Ltd., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. BoydDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1962
- Laker Airways Limited, a Foreign Corporation v. Sabena, Belgian World Airlines, a Foreign Corporation Klm, Royal Dutch Airlines, a Foreign Corporation, Laker Airways Limited, a Foreign Corporation v. Sabena, Belgian World Airlines, a Foreign Corporation, Klm, Royal Dutch Airlines, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984