Legal Opinion
Hughes v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 22, 2020No. 3:19-cv-01611Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Patricia Hughes, Plaintiff, Civil No. 3:19-cv-01611-JAM v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Co., May 22, 2020 Defendant. RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL [ECF NO. 30] AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER [ECF NO. 36] This is an ERISA disability benefits case. The plaintiff, Patricia Hughes, has moved the Court for an order compelling the defendant, Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (“Hartford”), to comply with thirteen requests for production and nine interrogatories. (Mot. to Compel, ECF No. 33.) Her discovery…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Conkright v. FrommertSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.