Legal Opinion

Ferrer Santiago v. Daimler Chrysler Corp.

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided March 27, 2003No. CIV.02-1780 (HL)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LAFFITTE, Chief Judge.

Presently before the Court is the motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction filed by co-defendant Daimler Chrysler Corp. (“DCC”) on September 5, 2002. (Docket No. 13.) Plaintiffs filed an opposition to said motion on September 18, 2002. (Docket No. 17.) A reply and a sur-reply were also filed. (See Dockets No. 21 and 22.)

In their complaint, Plaintiffs Alfredo Ferrer Santiago and his wife, Maria Virginia Rivera, bring forth a breach of warranty claim suit under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (“MMWA”), 15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq. Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Catherine Gardynski-Leschuck v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  2. James Suber v. Chrysler Corporation v. Kontinental Koaches, Inc., A/K/A and D/B/A Kontinental Konversions, Third-Party Chrysler Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. Barnes v. West, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
  4. Gabriel v. Mitsubishi Motor Sales of America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Curry v. Pleasurecraft Marine Engine Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API