Legal Opinion
Industrial Commission v. DiNardi
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided February 14, 1939No. 14,501PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knous
This is a workmen’s compensation case. So far as pertinent, the findings and award of the Industrial Commission upon which the controversy arises, are as follows :
“That Tony DiNardi, a boy nineteen years of age, was employed by the above named respondent employer (Victor-American Fuel Company) as a miner working underground. He sustained a fractured skull in an accident arising out of and within the course of his employment on January. 18, 1938. He died as a result of his injury on January 20,1938. He is survived by his father and mother and twin brothers born May 9, 1929. Claim was filed by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Prouse v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
- Ogden City v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1920
- Conners v. Public Service Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
- In re StewartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
- Paul v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Industrial Commission v. BetzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
- Industrial Commission v. SheardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
- Industrial Commission v. SheardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969