Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. DiNardi

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 14, 1939No. 14,501PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knous

This is a workmen’s compensation case. So far as pertinent, the findings and award of the Industrial Commission upon which the controversy arises, are as follows :

“That Tony DiNardi, a boy nineteen years of age, was employed by the above named respondent employer (Victor-American Fuel Company) as a miner working underground. He sustained a fractured skull in an accident arising out of and within the course of his employment on January. 18, 1938. He died as a result of his injury on January 20,1938. He is survived by his father and mother and twin brothers born May 9, 1929. Claim was filed by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Prouse v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  2. Ogden City v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Conners v. Public Service Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
  4. In re StewartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Paul v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. BetzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  2. Industrial Commission v. SheardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  3. Industrial Commission v. SheardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API